repository
대학 영작문 강의의 교사언어 비교 분석
- Subtitle
- 원어민교수 대 비원어민교수
- Alternative Title
- A Comparison of Native vs. Non-native Teacher Talk in College EFL Classrooms
- Author(s)
- 김정숙
- Alternative Author(s)
- Jeongsuk Gim
- Advisor
- 김현옥
- Department
- 교육대학원 영어교육
- Publisher
- The Graduate School, Ajou University
- Publication Year
- 2010-02
- Language
- kor
- Keyword
- 영어교육 교사언어; 원어민교사와 비원어민교사; 대학 영어 원어강의; 대학 영작문 강의
- Alternative Abstract
- The language in college EFL classrooms needs to be investigated since lectures in English have become regularized. Moreover, the importance of lectures in English has increased as the English immersion program of the new government has been emphasized. A useful focus of an inquiry would be the aspect of communicative language teaching. This study intends to investigate teacher talk of native and non-native English-speaking professors in two college English composition classes. The subjects of this study are one native English-speaking teacher (NEST) and non-native English-speaking teacher (non-NEST) each. The data was collected two or three times per each lecturer from voice and video recordings, and non-participation observations in the classrooms. Then, one recording each from both professors was analyzed in terms of language function, modifications and feedback. The results are as follows: first, looking at language function, the two high frequency functions of both professors were information and opinion functions. It goes with the general fact that information and opinion functions are the main language functions in a teacher-lead class. Second, looking at modifications and feedback, the non-NEST used comprehension checks much more than the NEST. It is related to the frequency of opinion; that is, the non-NEST used comprehension checks frequently when using the opinion function. Third, on another aspect of modifications and feedback, the frequency of repetition of the non-NEST was higher than that of the NEST. In the case of non-NEST, he repeated his own speech 10 times more than learners' speech. The repetition function was connected with the ctpes of transmission of information by professors. Fourth, on yet another aspect of modifications and feedback, the frequency of response was similar from both professors' speech. Additionally, types of response such as simple response, clarification requests, and confirmation checks were evenly used by both professors. This study suggests the aspects as follows: first, the application of various language functions such as suasion and future scenarios should be increased. Second, when it comes to high frequency language functions, in the case of information function, the application of guessing information by learners should be increased, instead of explaining information by a teacher. Third, on another aspect of high frequency language functions, the application of referential questions should be increased to induce learners' more active participation. In conclusion, various and specific ideas about teacher talk should involve consideration from more interactive communicative language teaching focusing on a learner-centered class. More research needs to be conducted under other English-progressed classes such as conversation and grammar classes in college EFL classrooms.
- Fulltext
- Appears in Collections:
- Special Graduate Schools > Graduate School of Education > English Education > 3. Theses(Master)
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
-
- License
- STATISTICS
- Total Visit :4,077,931
- Total Download :1,969
- Today View :8,361
