관세 절차 조정으로 인한 APEC 국가들 간의 국제 무역 장벽 해소
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 목영일 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Surjono, Nasruddin Djoio | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-08T07:38:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-08T07:38:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006-08 | - |
dc.identifier.other | 1742 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/handle/2018.oak/6145 | - |
dc.description | 학위논문(석사)--아주대학교 국제대학원--국제경영학과,2006. 8 | - |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgment i Abstract ii Contents v Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Identifying Problem 3 1.3 The Objectives 5 1.4 Hypothesis 5 1.5 Conceptual Framework 5 1.6 Data Gathering 9 1.7 Benefit of the Research 9 1.8 Study Procedure 10 Chapter 2 Literature Study 11 2.1 Regionalism 12 2.2 Trade Barriers 13 2.3 Trade Facilitation 18 2.4 Simplification and Harmonization on Customs Procedures 20 2.5 Why Do We Need to Simplify on Customs Procedures? 21 Chapter 3 Harmonization and Simplification of Customs Procedures in APEC 24 3.1 APEC’s characteristics 24 3.2 Tariff Reduction in APEC 28 3.3 The Subcommittee on Customs Procedures (SCCP) 33 3.4 Cross Country Analysis 39 3.4.1 Harmonization of tariff nomenclature 39 3.4.2 Public availability of information 41 3.4.3 Simplification and harmonization on the basis of the Revised Kyoto Convention 44 3.4.4 Computerization through UN/EDIFACT and paperless trading 47 3.4.5 Harmonization of Customs Valuation 49 3.4.6 Adoption of TRIPS 51 3.4.7 Appeal provision 53 3.4.8 Advance ruling systems 54 3.4.9 Temporary importation 55 3.4.10 Harmonized APEC data elements 56 3.4.11 Risk management approach 58 3.4.12 Express consignments 59 3.4.13 Integrity 60 3.4.14 Customs-Business Partnership 62 Chapter 4 Methods for Exploratory Analysis of Multivariate Data 64 4.1 Cluster 64 4.2 Dissimilarity or Similarity Measures 65 4.3 Amalgamation or Linkage Algorithm 66 Chapter 5 Classification of Customs Procedures among APEC Members Economies 70 5.1 Dendogram Plot Analysis 70 5.2 Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Statistics 72 5.3 Comparing Dendograms 74 Chapter 6 Conclusions and Recommendations 76 6.1 Conclusions 76 6.2 Recommendations 76 Reference 78 Appendix 81 About the Author 94 | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Graduate School of International Studies Ajou University | - |
dc.rights | 아주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다. | - |
dc.title | 관세 절차 조정으로 인한 APEC 국가들 간의 국제 무역 장벽 해소 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Nasruddin,Djoko | - |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.contributor.affiliation | 아주대학교 국제대학원 | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Nasruddin,Djoko | - |
dc.contributor.department | 국제대학원 국제경영학과 | - |
dc.date.awarded | 2006. 8 | - |
dc.description.degree | Master | - |
dc.identifier.localId | 565457 | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://dcoll.ajou.ac.kr:9080/dcollection/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000001742 | - |
dc.description.alternativeAbstract | ABSTRACT REDUCING INTERNATIONAL TRADE BARRIERS AMONG APEC MEMBER ECONOMIES BY HARMONIZING AND SIMPLIFYING CUSTOMS PROCEDURES NASRUDDIN DJOKO SURJONO 200427944 International Business Master Business Administration Program of Ajou University This study explores the customs procedures among 21 APEC member economies. The hypothesis of this research is “Are the customs procedures of APEC member economies similar in APEC, say, Indonesian customs more similar to the Thai customs than to Korean customs?”. To answer the above questions analysis are made by statistics tables and Cluster Methods. Statistics tables are prepared through cross country analyses by focusing on 14 factors i.e., Harmonization of Tariff Structure with the HS Convention, Public Availability of Information on Customs Laws, Regulations, Administrative Guidelines and Rulings provided to the business sector on an ongoing basis, Simplification and Harmonization on the Basis of the Kyoto Convention, Adoption and Support for the UN/EDIFACT/Paperless Trading, Adoption of the Principles of the WTO Valuation Agreement, Adoption of the Principles of the WTO Intellectual Property (TRIPS) Agreement, Introduction of Clear Appeals Provision, Introduction of an Advance Classification Ruling System, Provisions for Temporary Importation, e.g., acceding to the A.T.A. Carnet Convention or the Istanbul Convention, Harmonized APEC Data Elements, Risk Management Techniques, Guidelines on Express Consignments Clearance, Integrity and Customs-Business Partnership. The results of exploratory table analyses show that the most of APEC members are striving for harmonization and simplification of their customs procedures. The analysis carried out in the present study uses cluster analysis by grouping the positions of Customs Administrations of APEC Countries. This procedure is an attempt to identify relatively homogeneous groups of APEC Customs Administrations (21 cases) based on selected characteristics encompassing 97 variables. By using SPSS 11.5 software, this study examines binary data, 1 for adopted/implemented and 0 for not adopted/not implemented, and uses the Between Group Linkage Cluster Method and simple matching for selecting similarity. The result shows that there are two groups, first group members being South Korea, Singapore, Japan, New Zealand, United States, Canada, Malaysia, Mexico, Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Thailand, Chile, China, Philippine; Second group members, encompassing Peru, Vietnam, Brunei, Russia and Papua New Guinea. Also, the result answers the hypothesis that Indonesian customs more similar to the Thai customs than to Korean customs in certain degree. | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.