repository
거대 담관담석의 치료에서 내시경 유두큰풍선확장술 단독과 내시경 유두괄약근절개술을 함께 시행하는 내시경 유두큰풍선확장술의 비교
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 김진홍 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 황재철 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-21T07:21:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-10-21T07:21:54Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.other | 14949 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/handle/2018.oak/18278 | - |
| dc.description | 학위논문(박사)----아주대학교 일반대학원 :의학과,2013. 8 | - |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | ABSTRACT --------------------------- i TABLE OF CONTENTS ---------------- ii LIST OF FIGURES -------------------- iii LIST OF TABLES --------------------- iV I. INTRODUCTION --------------------1 II. MATERIALS AND METHODS --------2 III. RESULTS --------------------------6 IV. DISCUSSION ---------------------- 9 V. CONCLUSION --------------------- 12 REFERENCES -------------------------13 국문요약 ------------------------------17 | - |
| dc.language.iso | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | The Graduate School, Ajou University | - |
| dc.rights | 아주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다. | - |
| dc.title | 거대 담관담석의 치료에서 내시경 유두큰풍선확장술 단독과 내시경 유두괄약근절개술을 함께 시행하는 내시경 유두큰풍선확장술의 비교 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Endoscopic large-balloon dilation alone versus endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation for the treatment of large bile duct stones | - |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | 아주대학교 일반대학원 | - |
| dc.contributor.department | 일반대학원 의학과 | - |
| dc.date.awarded | 2013. 8 | - |
| dc.description.degree | Master | - |
| dc.identifier.localId | 571127 | - |
| dc.identifier.url | http://dcoll.ajou.ac.kr:9080/dcollection/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000014949 | - |
| dc.description.alternativeAbstract | Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) combined with large-balloon dilation (LBD) has been proposed as an alternative to manage large bile duct stones. However, recent reports indicate that LBD without EST may be safe and effective in this setting. One hundred thirty-one patients with large common bile duct (CBD) stones 12 mm in size or larger underwent LBD alone (n = 62) or EST plus LBD (n = 69) for lithotripsy. The therapeutic outcome and complications were reviewed and compared. There were no differences between the two groups with regard to age, size and number of stones, or bile duct diameter. The LBD alone group (mean age, 70.4 years) and the EST plus LBD group (mean age, 68.2 years) had similar outcomes in terms of overall successful stone removal (96.8% vs. 95.7%, P = 0.738) and complete stone removal without the need for mechanical lithotripsy (80.6% vs. 73.9%, P = 0.360). Complications in the LBD alone and EST plus LBD groups were as follows: pancreatitis (6.5% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.593), impaction of basket and stone (0% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.341), and perforation (0% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.341). LBD alone may be a simple, safe, and effective alternative to EST plus LBD in relatively aged patients with large CBD stones, and it can simplify the procedure compared with EST plus LBD. | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Graduate School of Ajou University > Department of Medicine > 3. Theses(Master)
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
-
- License
- STATISTICS
- Total Visit :3,297,242
- Total Download :1,737
- Today View :5,059
