신종양에서 술 전 방사선학적 크기와 술 후 병리학적 크기의 비교

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor김세중-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kook Bin-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T07:21:45Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-21T07:21:45Z-
dc.date.issued2013-08-
dc.identifier.other14696-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/handle/2018.oak/18259-
dc.description학위논문(석사)아주대학교 일반대학원 :의학과,2013. 8-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherThe Graduate School, Ajou University-
dc.rights아주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.-
dc.title신종양에서 술 전 방사선학적 크기와 술 후 병리학적 크기의 비교-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.affiliation아주대학교 일반대학원-
dc.contributor.department일반대학원 의학과-
dc.date.awarded2013. 8-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.identifier.localId571076-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dcoll.ajou.ac.kr:9080/dcollection/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000014696-
dc.subject.keyword신장-
dc.subject.keyword종양-
dc.subject.keyword병리학-
dc.subject.keyword방사선학-
dc.description.alternativeAbstractPurpose: We evaluated the effects of different tumor conditions on discrepancy between radiologically measured size and true size of renal tumors. Materials and Methods: The data from 238 patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy for a renal tumor at our institution were reviewed. Radiologic tumor size defined as the largest diameter on a CT scan was compared to pathologic tumor size defined as the largest diameter on gross pathologic examination. Results: There was no significant difference between the mean radiologic and pathologic size for all tumors (p=0.078). When stratified according to radiologic size range, mean radiologic size was significantly larger than mean pathologic size for tumors <4 cm (p=0.001), but there was no significant difference between them for tumors 4-7 cm, and >7 cm. When classified according to histologic subtype, mean radiologic size was significantly larger than pathologic size only in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (p=0.005). When classified according to tumor location, mean radiologic size was larger than pathologic size in endophytic tumors (p=0.050), but not in exophytic tumors. When endophytic tumors were stratified according to radiologic size range, there was a significant difference between the radiologic and pathologic size for tumors <4 cm (p<0.001) and 4-7 cm (p=0.007), but not for tumors >7 cm. Conclusions: Radiologic tumor size seems to correlate well with pathologic tumor size. However, there was a tendency to overestimate tumor size in smaller tumors. Endophytic renal tumors are more likely to have size overestimated by CT scan than exophytic tumors.-
Appears in Collections:
Graduate School of Ajou University > Department of Medicine > 3. Theses(Master)
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse