repository
명시적 암묵적 편견의 순응성: 심리적 관점의 남북 통일
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 김도영 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 김수동 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-21T07:13:44Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-10-21T07:13:44Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2010-02 | - |
| dc.identifier.other | 10402 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/handle/2018.oak/17490 | - |
| dc.description | 학위논문(석사)--아주대학교 일반대학원 :경영학과,2010. 2 | - |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1. Introduction = 1 1. Theoretical Background = 1 1. Current Situation between South and North Koreas Relationship = 1 2. Issues of Psychological Unification = 2 3. How can we understand and measure prejudice? = 4 1. Definition of Prejudice = 4 2. Dual Process of Prejudices: Explicit and Implicit Attitudes = 5 3. Definition of Implicit and Explicit Prejudice = 6 4. Why is implicit prejudice important? = 7 1. Introspective limits and Social Deniability = 7 2. Relationship of Behavior and Attitude = 8 3. Stability of Implicit Prejudice = 9 5. Malleability of Explicit and Implicit Prejudice = 10 2. The Overview of Present Study = 11 2. Study 1 = 12 1. Participants and Procedure = 13 1. Participants = 13 2. Overview of Procedure = 13 2. Measurement Scales = 14 1. Explicit Measure (Semantic Differential Scale: Cognitive Aspect of Explicit National Attitudes) = 14 2. Explicit Measure (Thermometer Scale: Affective Aspect of Explicit National Attitudes) = 15 3. Implicit Measure (Nation Implicit Association Test (Nation-IAT): Implicit National Attitudes) = 15 3. Results = 17 1. Explicit and Implicit Attitudes toward South and North Koreas in Pre-Test = 17 1. Overall Data Analysis in Explicit and Implicit Attitudes· = 17 2. Cohort Differences in Explicit and Implicit Attitudes = 18 2. Manipulation Effect: Change in Explicit and Implicit Attitudes = 18 1. Manipulation Effect of Explicit Attitudes = 19 2. Manipulation Effect of Implicit Attitudes = 20 3. Study 2 = 21 1. Participants and Procedure = 22 1. Participants = 22 2. Overview of Procedure = 22 2. Results = 23 1. Changing of Explicit Pro-South Korea Attitudes between Before and After Summit = 23 2. Changing of Implicit Pro-South Korea Attitudes between Before and After Summit = 24 4. Study 3 = 25 1. Participants and Procedure = 28 1. Participants = 28 2. Overview of Procedure = 28 2. Measurement Scales = 29 1. Explicit Measures (Semantic Differential and Thermometer Scales) = 29 2. Implicit Measure (People Implicit Association Test: People-IAT) = 30 3. Manipulation (Subliminal Evaluative Conditioning) = 31 4. Results = 33 1. Explicit and Implicit Attitudes toward South and North Koreans in Pre-test = 33 2. Manipulation Effect: Change in Explicit and Implicit Attitudes = 33 1. Manipulation Effect of Explicit Attitudes = 34 2. Manipulation Effect of Implicit Attitudes = 34 5. Discussion = 36 1. Discussion of Results = 36 1. Summary of Results = 36 2. Existence of Explicit and Implicit Prejudice = 37 3. Difference malleability between Explicit and Implicit Prejudice = 38 4. Implication and Suggestion for Psychological Unification of South and North Koreas = 39 2. Limitations and Conclusions = 41 1. Limitations and Future Directions = 41 2. Summary and Conclusions = 42 6. References = 44 | - |
| dc.language.iso | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | The Graduate School, Ajou University | - |
| dc.rights | 아주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다. | - |
| dc.title | 명시적 암묵적 편견의 순응성: 심리적 관점의 남북 통일 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Sudong Kim | - |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | 아주대학교 일반대학원 | - |
| dc.contributor.alternativeName | Sudong Kim | - |
| dc.contributor.department | 일반대학원 경영학과 | - |
| dc.date.awarded | 2010. 2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | Master | - |
| dc.identifier.localId | 568560 | - |
| dc.identifier.url | http://dcoll.ajou.ac.kr:9080/dcollection/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000010402 | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | 남북통일 | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | 명시적 암묵적 편견 | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | 편견 | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | 순응성 | - |
| dc.description.alternativeAbstract | From the social conflicts between groups of Eastern and Western Germans after unification, it can be inferred that prejudice could be a potential problem for Korean reunification. The three studies reported in this paper investigated methods to provide ways to reduce explicit (conscious) and implicit (nonconscious) aspects of prejudice of South Koreans against North Korea (study 1 and 2) and against North Koreans (study 3). In Studies 1 and 2, we found that explicit prejudice was affected by temporary exposures to relationships concerning South and North Koreas, but implicit prejudice was not. In Study 3, however, we found that implicit prejudice was reduced by repeated exposure to positive associations with “North Korean”. Scientific and political implications of the malleability of the two aspects of prejudice for psychological unification are discussed. | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Graduate School of Ajou University > Department of Business Administration > 3. Theses(Master)
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
-
- License
- STATISTICS
- Total Visit :3,722,702
- Total Download :1,818
- Today View :360
