RELATIONSHIP ON ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT OF FOREINGN COMPANIES IN VIETNAM

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisorYungho Cho-
dc.contributor.authorNHUNG, NGUYEN THI QUYNH-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-08T08:21:34Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-08T08:21:34Z-
dc.date.issued2015-01-
dc.identifier.other18345-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/handle/2018.oak/13047-
dc.description학위논문(석사)--아주대학교 Graduate School of International Studies :국제경영학과,2015. 1-
dc.description.tableofcontentsTABLE OF CONTENTS ABTRACT .......................................................................................................................................i ACKNOWLEDMENT ...................................................................................................................ii TABLE CONTENT ......................................................................................................................iii LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................vi LIST OF ABREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................vii CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ......................1 1.1 Statement of the problem................................................................................................. ..........1 1.2 The purpose and objective of study ......................3 1.3 Significance of the study ......................3 1.4 Scope and limitation of the study ......................4 CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW ......................5 2.1 Organizational Justice ......................5 2.2 Organizational commitment ......................7 2.3 Organizational justice relationship organizational commitment ......................8 2.4 Moderating effects of gender on the relationship between organizational justice and organizational commitment: ......................9 CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ....................13 3.1 Conceptual framework ....................13 3.2 Research method ....................13 3.2.1 Sample and data collection...................................................................................................13 3.2.2 Research instrument .............................................................................................................13 3.2.3 Translation ...........................................................................................................................14 3.2.4 Structure of the instrument ...................................................................................................14 3.2.5 Data Analysis .......................................................................................................................14 CHAPTER IV: EMPERICAL ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS…….........................16 4.1 Demographic of respondents ..................................................................................................16 4.2 Scale reliability and factor analysis ........................................................................................18 4.3 Data analysis ...........................................................................................................................21 4.4 Discussion of results ...............................................................................................................30 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION .....................................................................................................33 REFERENCE ...................36 APPENDIX 1: ENGLISH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE .........................................................41 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3-1: Conceptual model of the study…………………………………………………………13. Figure 4-2 Moderating effect of gender on the relationship between interactional justice and affective commitment.........................................................25 Figure 4-3: Moderating effect of gender on the relationship between procedural justice and affective commitment………………………………………………………25 Figure 4-4 Moderating effect of gender on the relationship between interactional justice and normative commitment……………………………………………………29 Figure 4-5 Moderating effect of gender on the relationship between procedural justice and normative commitment………………………………………………………29 LIST OF TABLES Table 4-1: Demographic composition of participants........13 Table 4-2: Reliability analysis result...............................18 Table 4-3: Factor Analysis for Distributive Justice (DJ), Procedural Justice (PJ), Interactional Analysis(IJ)............19 Table 4-4: Factor Analysis for Affective Commitment (AC), Continuance Commitment (CC), Normative Commitment (NC)...........................................................................20 Table 4-5: Relationship between organizational commitment and Organizational Justice (Pearson)..........22 Table 4-6: Summarized regression results for dependent variable affective commitment.......................................23 Table 4-7: Summarized regression results for dependent variable continuance commitment.................................26 Table 4-8: Summarized regression results for dependent variable normative commitment....................................28-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherGraduate School of International Studies Ajou University-
dc.rights아주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.-
dc.titleRELATIONSHIP ON ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT OF FOREINGN COMPANIES IN VIETNAM-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.affiliation아주대학교 국제대학원-
dc.contributor.department국제대학원 국제경영학과-
dc.date.awarded2015. 2-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.identifier.localId695426-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dcoll.ajou.ac.kr:9080/dcollection/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000018345-
dc.description.alternativeAbstractABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between organizational justice and organizational commitment of foreign companies in Vietnam. . The six factors selected as measurement of organizational justice and organizational commitment was distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice, affective commitment, continuance commitment and normative commitment. A questionnaire based survey was used to collect data. The questionnaire was distributed to 256 respondents. Several statistical data analysis methods were applied mainly Cronch bach’alpha, factor analysis, correlation and multiple regression. Interactional justice was found to have positive relationship to affective commitment. In the relationship between interactional justice and affective commitment, female is more sensitive to interactional justice than male. And male was found to be more sensitive to procedural justice than female in the relationship between procedural justice and affective commitment. Results also show that female more sensitive to procedural justice than male in the relationship between procedural justice and normative commitment while male is more sensitive to interactional justice than female in the relationship between interactional justice and normative commitment.-
Appears in Collections:
Special Graduate Schools > Graduate School of International Studies > Department of International Business > International Business > 3. Theses(Master)
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse