ORGANIC LAW , A CATALYST FOR SOCIAL COHESION AND DEVELOPMENT IN POST CONFLICT STATES;

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisorKang Shin Goo-
dc.contributor.authorTimah, Rene Motangu-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-08T08:18:48Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-08T08:18:48Z-
dc.date.issued2015-08-
dc.identifier.other20090-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/handle/2018.oak/12763-
dc.description학위논문(석사)--Graduate School of International Studies Ajou University :국제개발협력과,2015. 8-
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER 1 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 Historical trends leading to the fragmentation of the social fabric of Burundi and 3 1.2.1 Burundi. 3 1.2.2 Rwanda 4 1.3 ABOUT THE STUDY. 5 1.4 Method of Data collection and Analysis 6 1.5 Objective of the Study. 6 1.6 SIGNIFICANCE 6 1.7 Underlying assumptions 7 1.8 Research Question 7 1.9 Hypotheses. 8 1.10 Key Conceptual definitions. 8 1.10.1 Social Cohesion 8 1.10.2 Social exclusion. 9 1.10.3 Social inclusion. 10 1.10.4 Social capital 11 CHAPTER 2 13 2.1 LITERATURE REVIEW. 13 2.2 Theoretical Framework of Analysis 17 2.2.1 The Theory Of Change(TOC). 17 CHAPTER 3 21 3.1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF HUTUS AND TUTSIS IN RWANDA AND BURUNDI. 21 3.2 Colonial legacy. 22 3.3 Organic Law 25 3.4 Meaning of Organic Law 26 3.5 Importance of Organic Law in post war Fragmented societies 27 3.6 Law rebuilding its Relationship with the Society:. 28 3.7 Organic Laws of Rwanda 29 3.7.1 Under the root cause and Justice. 30 3.7.2 Why Genocide Ideology Law Came into effect 30 3.7.3 Reshaping Political Organisations 31 3.7.4 Institutional Development Theory 33 3.7.5 The Healthy Relationships and Connections Theory: 34 3.8 Similarities between Rwanda and Burundi in relation to Reconciliation mechanism as designed by their Organic law . 35 3.9 Difference between Rwanda and Burundi in relation to reconciliation mechanism . 36 3.10 Difference in Addressing the Root causes through Organic Law 37 3.11 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RWANDA AND BURUNDI IN RELATION TO THE OPERATION FOR SPECIAL COURT 37 CHAPTER 4 40 4.1 SOCIAL COHESION 40 4.2 Social Cohesion in relation to this study. 41 4.3 Social Cohesion;integration of horizontal,vertical and bridging social capital. 42 4.4 MEASUREMENT OF SOCIAL COHESION IN RWANDA AND BURUNDI AFTER 1994. 46 4.4.1 Research designed. 47 4.5 CONCLUSION 51 4.6 RECOMMENDATION. 53 4.6.1 Promote Healthy relationship and connection. 53 4.6.2.Pro Active Institutions 53 4.6.3 Neutralize too much bonding 53 REFERENCE. 55-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherGraduate School of International Studies Ajou University-
dc.rights아주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.-
dc.titleORGANIC LAW , A CATALYST FOR SOCIAL COHESION AND DEVELOPMENT IN POST CONFLICT STATES;-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.affiliation아주대학교 국제대학원-
dc.contributor.department국제대학원 국제개발협력학과-
dc.date.awarded2015. 8-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.identifier.localId705444-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dcoll.ajou.ac.kr:9080/dcollection/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000020090-
dc.subject.keywordorganic law-
dc.subject.keywordsocial cohesion-
dc.subject.keywordsocial inclusion-
dc.subject.keywordsocial exclusion-
dc.subject.keywordsocial capital-
dc.description.alternativeAbstractABSTRACT This research paper , explore the possible relationship between Organic law and social cohesion in post conflict Burundi and Rwanda between the Hutus and Tutsi ethnic groups.The study affirms that IF Organic law is designed and implemented to curb social exclusion and discrimination, Then Social cohesion will increase because the roots causes of the previous conflict has been taken into consideration. Rwanda and Burundi were faced with one of the most devastated ethnic conflict in the 90s between the Hutus and the Tutsis. Although they were underpinned by the same circumstances, the resilience of Rwanda within the last 20 years is beyond imagination. While the developmental indicators of Rwanda has greatly improved ,Burundi still lament among the poorest and most fragile country in the world. This study there fore hypothesize that organic Law has foster social cohesion in Rwanda which gives her an urge over Burundi whose designated laws failed to prioritize the root causes of the previous conflict. In the verge of pursuing the findings,this study used indicators of social cohesion as postulated in the work of Jane Jenson (1998) to measure the level of social cohesion between the Hutus and the Tutsis in both countries. It was evident that Rwanda is doing better than Burundi who is almost trapped at the same spot after 1993 conflict. Based on the Theory of change,the study confirms that the successes of Rwanda stems from the designing and implementation of her organic law which created independent institutions such as the traditional Gacaca court system which was responsible for the trial,reconciliation and rehabilitation of the perpetrators of the genocide.In addition,the existence of the National Unity and reconciliation commission was also formidable in transforming the behaviors and attitude of Rwandans there by formulating a high level of vertical and bridging social capital which are elements of social cohesion. In contrast, Burundi failed to established a transitional court to trial perpetrators. Although the Organic law of Burundi created the national unity and reconciliation council,her operation is passive as compared to that of Rwanda who went as far as creating re-conciliatory villages for perpetrators and victims to stay side by side. As a result of this,there exist a wider gap between vertical and bridging social capital in Burundi which is detrimental for national cohesion. At the time of this writing, Rwanda occupies the 151 spot in the human development index report of 2014 while Burundi is humbled with position number 180, leaving her among the first four poorest countries in the world and one of the most fragile in Africa. Key words: Organic law,Social Cohesion,Social inclusion,Social Exclusion, Social Capital-
dc.title.subtitleTHE CASE OF THE HUTUS AND THE TUTSIS AFTER THE BURUNDI 1993 AND RWANDA 1994 GENOCIDE.-
Appears in Collections:
Special Graduate Schools > Graduate School of International Studies > Department of International Development Cooperation > 3. Theses(Master)
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse