BROWSE

Special Graduate Schools Graduate School of International Studies Department of International Development Cooperation 3. Theses(Master)

An Analysis of the Impact of MDG One [Eradicate Extreme Hunger and Poverty] Through the Millennium Village Projects: A Case Study of Ruhiira Uganda

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisorIain Watson-
dc.contributor.authorMUSASIZI, JOSEPH-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-08T08:10:49Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-08T08:10:49Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-
dc.identifier.other24029-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ajou.ac.kr/handle/2018.oak/11247-
dc.description학위논문(석사)--아주대학교 국제대학원 :국제개발협력과,2017. 2-
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1 1.0 Background 1 1.1 Statement of the Problem 2 1.2 Research questions 3 1.3 Analysis of the impact of MVP/ Objective 3 1.4 Hypothesis 3 1.5 Significance of the study 3 1.6 The theoretical Framework 4 1.7 Methodology 4 1.7.1 Research design 5 1.7.2 Why document review methodology 6 1.8 Scope of the study 6 1.9. Limitations of the study 6 1.10 Definition of Terms 7 1.11 Thesis Organization 7 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 9 2.0 Introduction 9 2.1 Ruhiira MVP project in Uganda 9 2.2 Poverty in Contemporary Uganda 12 Figure 2: The poor, insecure non-poor and the middle class, 1992/3-2012/12 15 2.3 What has the Ugandan government done before to eradicate poverty in rural areas 16 2.4 What has been achieved after the introduction of MVP in Uganda 18 Figure 3:Sub-regional performance as of 2012/13 19 2.5 Did MVP increase farming production to curb hunger problems 20 2.6 Are there differences between MVP supported and non-supported villages in terms of social and economic development resulting from farming 21 2.7 Identifiable differences in peoples standard of living between the period before and after the MVP 23 CHAPTER THREE: A DETAILED DIAGNOSIS OF MVP CHALLENGES 27 3.0 Introduction 27 3.1 MVP implementation Challenge 27 3.2 MVP Coordination challenges 31 3.3 Geographical and Historical challenges to the Project 33 CHAPTER FOUR: PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS 36 4.0 Introduction 36 4.1 Analysis of Ruhiira MVP at Inception 36 4.2 What had the Ugandan government tried before to eradicate poverty in rural areas and the results 38 4.2 Did MVP increase farming production to curb hunger problems 39 4.3 Did MVP increase peoples household income 40 4.4 Is there any difference between MVP supported villages and non-supported villages in production 41 4.5 Is there any identifiable difference within peoples standard of living between the period before and after the MVP 42 CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION 45 5.0 Introduction 45 5.1 Snapshot of Ruhiira Challenges at baseline 45 5.2 SUMMARY 46 5.3 CONCLUSION 47 5.4 RECOMMENDATION 48 REFERENCE LIST 49 LIST OF APPENDICES 55 Appendix 1: Map of Africa Showing MVP sites 55 Appendix 2: Number and percent of Ugandans that are poor, insecure non-poor and middle class 56 Appendix 3: Inequality based on the Gini coefficient 56-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherGraduate School of International Studies Ajou University-
dc.rights아주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.-
dc.titleAn Analysis of the Impact of MDG One [Eradicate Extreme Hunger and Poverty] Through the Millennium Village Projects: A Case Study of Ruhiira Uganda-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.affiliation아주대학교 국제대학원-
dc.contributor.department국제대학원 국제개발협력학과-
dc.date.awarded2017. 2-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.identifier.localId770204-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dcoll.ajou.ac.kr:9080/dcollection/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000024029-
dc.subject.keywordInternational Development Cooperation-
dc.description.alternativeAbstractAbstract This study analyzed the Impact of MDG One [Eradicate Extreme Hunger and Poverty] through the Millennium Village Projects (MVP) with special focus on Ruhiira MVP Uganda. This resulted from the conclusion drawn by previous scholars arguing that MVP did not contribute in eradicate extreme hunger and poverty in Africa a project which was fully funded for almost 10 years. The question to answer was why a heavenly funded project for such a long period may create so less or no impact in the community? To analyze this effectively, the study evaluated farming production trends such as before and after the MVP inception and also made a comparative analysis between the supported and none supported villages. The study also analyzed income trends such as before and after the MVP and also evaluated whether MVP improvement people’s standard of living. The study was qualitative and applied literature review as a method of data collection and analysis. The findings were in line with the study hypothesis which stated that, MVPs increased food production and therefore they contributed highly in eradicating extreme poverty and hunger in rural Sub-Saharan Africa. The study also correlated with the theoretical framework of big Push theory which assumes that foreign aid has a positive relationship with social and economic development of developing countries. The study confirmed this after the results showed that 57% of the households within the MVP had enough maize supply for 10–12 months per year, as compared to only 29% of the households in the non-supported villages The results indicated an increase in all agricultural products especially banana and the number of banana marketing groups increasing leading to elevation in banana Prices from an average of 3500-4 000 UGX per bunch in 2007 to an average of 8500 UGX by May 2010 leading to an improvement in the economic status of farmers. The study also identified a good relationship between increased in agriculture and other social and economic development. For example increase in food production in Ruhiira led to increase in school enrolment and reduced school dropout. Also child mortality, maternal mortality and general health improved tremendously due to both increase in local food consumption and elevation in income The study recommended for another study to be conducted identifying the extent to which social classes affected Ruhiira MVP, considering all the projects thematic areas other than Agriculture alone which was most scholars concentrated on-
Appears in Collections:
Special Graduate Schools > Graduate School of International Studies > Department of International Development Cooperation > 3. Theses(Master)
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

  • License
    sherpa_romeo
    sherpa_juliet
STATISTICS
Total Visit :3,624,348
Total Download :1,804
Today View :4,828

AJOU

AJOU Central Library Repository는 국립중앙도서관 OAK 보급사업으로 구축되었습니다.

Browse

OAK Portal LOGIN